Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11947 (RAJ)

NARENDRA KUMAR S/O SULTAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2019/2026 · 2026-08-05

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:30573] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2019/2026 CNR: RJHC020308072026 | URN: CRLMP / 4619U / 2026 1. Narendra Kumar S/o Sultan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Lampuwa, Reengus Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar. 2. Mahendra S/o Sultan, R/o Village Lampuwa, Reengus Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar. 3. Jayant Kumar S/o Mahendra, R/o Village Lampuwa, Reen- gus Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar. 4. Sultan S/o Kajod, R/o Village Lampuwa, Reengus Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Ganguram S/o Ganpat Ram, R/o Lampuwa, Reengus, Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Y.K. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/08/2026 1. The instant petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, seeking quashing of FIR No.74/2026 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 329(3), 342(2) & 303(2) of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned State Counsel places on record the factual report dated 21.07.2026. As per which, negative final report has been proposed by the police opining that false FIR has been lodged. [2026:RJ-JP:30573] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2019/2026] 3. Learned State Counsel is directed to instruct the Investigating Officer of this case to submit the result of investigation within a period of four weeks from today. 4. In view of above, the prayer made in this petition does not survive anymore. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Misc. Petition as well as stay application is dismissed as having become infructuous. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. 7. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to revive this petition, if the result of investigation is not submitted within a period of four weeks. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN/43