2026:JHHC:14658 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3204 of 2026 Ramesh Kumar Yadav @ Ramesh Kumar, son of Mahendra Yadav … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 03/13.05.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026, registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that two mobiles, four SIM cards and one laptop was alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2026 and charge-sheet has already been submitted. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no victim has been identified. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail. However, he does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted coupled with the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions 2026:JHHC:14658 2 Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:13.05.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:14.05.2026