Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11947 (CHH)

SMT. SATYABHAMA MESHRAM v. SMT. SATIKA MESHRAM

MCC/46/2026 · 2026-01-18

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3118 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 46 of 2026 Smt. Satyabhama Meshram Wd/o Ramdas Meshram Aged About 48 Years R/o Ganesh Ward No. 8, Dongargarh, Tahsil And District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff/ Appellant) ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Satika Meshram Wd/o Ramdas Meshram Aged About 50 Years R/o Ganesh Ward No. 8, Present Address Danteshwari Para, Ward No. 2, Near Sai Baba Temple, Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh (Defendant/ Non-Applicant No. 1) 2 - Divisional Forest Office Forest Division General, Khairagarh, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 2) 3 - District Treasury Officer Office Of Collector Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 3) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 4) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. S.R.J. Jaiswal, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 19/01/2026 1. The matter has been listed on default. VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2026.01.19 19:25:22 +0530 2 2. It transpires that the MCC has been filed on the basis of the web copy, however, the certified copy of the order dated 14.11.2025 has not been annexed with the MCC. 3. In view of the above, I am not inclined to grant time to learned counsel for the applicant for removing the default. 4. The present MCC is dismissed on this ground alone. However, he is at liberty to repeat the same by duly constituted application. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved