906 cp 28-20 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONT. PETITION NO. 28 OF 2020 IN PIL/146/2018 BAPU UKHA MALI AND ANOTHER VERSUS ASIMKUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS … Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. Desale Nilesh N., Advocate for Respondent No.5 …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 24/09/2026 PER COURT : 1. None for the petitioners. 2. However, as per the order under contempt, an enquiry was to be initiated and thereafter, appropriate steps were to be taken for punishing the persons responsible. 3. Learned counsel for Respondent – Zilla Parishad, Dhule, has placed on record a communication dated 19/05/2023, stating that an enquiry has been initiated in compliance with the order and that an FIR has also been lodged in that regard. The said communication is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 4. In view of the above, nothing further survives in the present petition. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:44109-DB