Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11940 (JHR)

MD. SAMSAD ALIAS SAMSAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4158/2026 · 2026-05-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:14859] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4158 of 2026 ------ Md. Samsad @ Samsad, aged about 25 years, son of Md. Mukhtar, resident of Village Cheriya Bariyarpur, P.O. and P.S. Cheriya Bariyarpur, District Begusarai (Bihar) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Roy, Advocate Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-14-05-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a Supplementary Affidavit. Let the same be kept in the record. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sector-04 P.S. Case No.02 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 310 (2), 312, 331 (3), 205, 111, 336 (3) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons impersonated themselves as police personnel for the purpose of committing dacoity but upon activation of the alarm siren, fled away. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner was never put on the Test Identification Parade as mentioned inpara-12 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.02.2026 as has been mentioned in para-04 of the Supplementary Affidavit. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro in connection with Sector-04 P.S. Case No.02 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-14.05.2026-Animesh/