Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1194 (BOM)

RAHUL S/O ASHOK ZALTE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO BHANDARA DIST BHANDARA

APPP/1688/2026 · 2026-06-17

Shri Pravin S Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 04 APPP 1688.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPP] NO.1688 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION [ABA] NO.169 OF 2026 [D] [Mr. Rahul s/o Ashok Zalte .vs. The State of Maharashtra] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the Applicant. Mr. H.D. Marathe, APP for Respondent. ………….. CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 17-06-2026. 1. The learned APP has pointed out from the record the order passed by this court dated 8.5.2026 which read as under : “This is an application for restoration of anticipatory bail application. 2. Considering the fact that, the liberty of citizen is involved, the application is allowed and an anticipatory bail application is restored. 3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 169 OF 2026 4. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of as withdrawn. 2. In view of the above court’s order, it is clear that this court has restored his bail application and on permission sought 2 04 APPP 1688.26.odt by Applicant, same was allowed to withdraw. In view of this, the present application being devoid of merit, the same is rejected. (PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) Gulande