Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11938 (ALL)

CHET RAM v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/40165/2026 · 2026-10-04

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40165 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for removal of illegal encroachment by private parties upon his own land, however, he submits that for demarcation of his boundary wall , he has already approached the authority concerned by filing application dated 21.8.2026 under Section 24 of the Revenue Code, 2006, but the same has remained undisposed of. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent nos. 2 and 3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after giving full opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties. October 5, 2026 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Karmendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Chet Ram .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad