MANU KUMAR SAW ALIAS MANNU KUMAR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2781/2026 · 2026-05-06
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11936 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11936 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13464 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2781 of 2026
Manu Kumar Saw @ Mannu Kumar Saw, aged about 23 years, S/o: Manoj Saw
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Advocate
For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P.
---
06/06.05.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2026 in connection with Hazaribagh Bishnugarh P.S. case No. 01 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and under Sections 66C, 66D and 67 of Information Technology Act pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribag.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has already been framed and there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner. He has submitted that one case was instituted in Vijaypur Karnataka and there it was found that the mobile seized in the present case was involved in the case which was instituted at Vijaypur Karnataka and ultimately the petitioner was arrested.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the matter relates to committing cybercrime in the name of sex-services and naked photographs of girls were uploaded in the website through the mobile.
Learned counsel has submitted that on the basis of the information received, the raid was conducted and the petitioner was apprehended.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner and the lead
2026:JHHC:13464 2
which has been found during investigation, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. The instant bail application is accordingly rejected.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 06.05.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-08.05.2026