Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11935 (GAU)

M/S ASKER FOOD PRODUCTS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/4429/2026 · 2026-08-20

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010174812026 2026:GAU-AS:11982 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4429/2026 M/S ASKER FOOD PRODUCTS HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BADARPURGHAT DISTRICT SRI BHUMI ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY SRI RAJIB PAUL AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, SON OF SRI HARI SANKAR PAUL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ALAKULIPUR (I.E) P.O BADARPURGHAT, P S BADARPUR, DISTRICT SRI BHUMI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES, COMMERCE AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRIBHUMI P.O. AND PS. SRIBHUMI ASSAM 3:THE COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE UDYOG BHAWAN BAMUNIMAIDAN GUWAHATI 781021 4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (IN- CHARGE) DISTRICT INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE CENTRE SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN 788803 5:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI 781021 ASSAM 6:THE IN CHARGE ZONAL OFFICE ASIDC LTD BADARPUR GHAT Page No.# 2/2 SRIBHUMI PIN- 788803 7:THE ESTATE OFFICER INDUSTRIES ESTATE BADARPURGHAT SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN 78880 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. J PURKAYASTHA, MRS. S ROY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ASIDC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 21.08.2026 Heard Ms. S. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4; and Mr. S. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Small Industries Development Corporation Limited [ASIDCL] for the respondent nos. 5, 6 & 7. In this writ petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed an Order of eviction no. SIDC/IE/BDP/8/2019-20/8841 dated 14.07.2026 passed under the hand of the respondent no. 4. Mr. Das, learned Standing Counsel, ASIDCL has submitted that by an Office Letter no. KDICC[IE]/7/2020-21/380-383 dated 18.08.2026, the impugned eviction order has been cancelled and has placed a copy of the said Office Letter before the Court. As the Order of eviction no. SIDC/IE/BDP/8/2019-20/8841 dated 14.07.2026 has already been cancelled, there is no surviving cause of action to proceed further with the present writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant