GHANSHYAM SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI OMPRAKASH SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12168/2026 · 2026-08-07
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11933 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11933 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:30978] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12168/2026 CNR: RJHC020738432026 | URN: CRLMB / 22372U / 2026 Ghanshyam Sharma S/o Late Shri Omprakash Sharma, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Thathaavata, Police Station Ratangarh, District Churu (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Neemkathana). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Arpan Kumar Sharma Mr. Bharat Rohin For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/08/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.346/2024 registered at Police Station Neem Ka Thana Sadar, District Neem Ka Thana for offences under Sections 189(2), 307, 115(2), 126(2) and 324(5) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that similarly situated co-accused Vidhyadhar has been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated
27.11.2024. The case of the present petitioner is akin to him.
[2026:RJ-JP:30978] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12168/2026] Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.07.2026 without any criminal past. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner- Ghanshyam Sharma S/o Late Shri Omprakash Sharma be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/73