SHAHEENA v. UNION OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1091/2026 · 2026-05-19
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1193 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1193 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 10 Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 1091/2026 Shaheena …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Salih Pirzada, Advocate Vs. Union of India and Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 19.05.2026
01.
01. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous in the light of the fact that the show cause notice which has been challenged in the instant petition has culminated in a final order during the pendency of this petition, as such, he seeks withdrawal of the same with liberty to challenge the aforesaid order.
02.
02. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
03.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 19.05.2026
“Shamim Dar”