Crl.O.P.No.10265 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.10265 of 2026 V.Sundarraj ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thakkolam Police Station, Ranipet District. Crime No.24 of 2026 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.24 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Anandaraj For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(3), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act read with Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.24 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10265 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has given some amount as loan to the defacto complainant’s son, subsequently, he has not repaid the same. Hence, on the date of occurrence, the petitioner herein went to the house of the defacto complainant and attacked her and her husband with knife and caused severe injuries, which led to the registration fo the case. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner got one similar previous case. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10265 of 2026 5. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has one similar previous case, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 22.04.2026 sma To 1. The Inspector of Police, Thakkolam Police Station, Ranipet District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10265 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. sma Crl.O.P.No.10265 of 2026 22.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis