903 cp 239-19 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CONT. PETITION NO. 239 OF 2019 IN WP/7123/2018 YOGESH MURLIDHAR CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS VERSUS GANESH BHASKAR CHAUDHARI … Mr. Rane Girish S., Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. Sonawane Maheshkumar S., Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr. Sujit S. Kulkarni h/f Mr. Dixit Sushant V., Advocate for RespondentNo.3 …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 24/09/2026 PER COURT : Though learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has been elevated as a Judge of this Court, but in view of the order dated 17/01/2022, it is clear that substantial compliance of the order under contempt has already been made. Further, in view of the passage of time, it may safely be presumed that the grievance of the petitioners must have been redressed. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:44110-DB