APHC010983892018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 47337 OF 2018 Between: 1. Chinnamurthy Appa Rao, S/o.Sriramulu Occ. Farmer, Aged about 56 years, R/o.Chinnapalkaluru Village, Guntur Rural, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department ,Velgapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist. 2. The District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur Rural, Guntur District. 4. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Guntur Mandal, Guntur District. 5. Bolemera Samuel, S/o. Ananda Rao Aged about 42 years, R/o. Thokavaripalem Village, Guntur Rural, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring questing the action of the respondents in not issuing the pattadar pass book to the petitioner with respect to the agricultural 2 VS,J W.P.No.47337 of 2018 land an extent of Ac. 0.50 cents in Sy.No. 321/A inspite of the Decree passed in favour of the petitioner in IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation 04-12-2017 pending disposal of the present writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI Counsel for the Respondents: NANDA KISHORE KONDURI Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following 3 VS,J W.P.No.47337 of 2018 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “….to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring questing the action of the respondents in not issuing the pattadar pass book to the petitioner with respect to the agricultural land an extent of Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.321/A inspite of the Decree passed in favour of the petitioner....” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that, in view of the endorsement issued by the Tahisdar, Guntur Mandal, on 27.02.2018 i.e., pending the writ petition, no further cause survives for adjudication in this matter and that the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 22.09.2026 KGR