2026:JHHC:13957 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3985 of 2026 Babu Miyan @ Babujan Ansari, aged about 38 years, S/o Khalil Miyan … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, Advocate --- 02/08.05.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2026 in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 109, 76, 351(2), 352 of BNS pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C. Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier on 18th March, 2026 in B.A. No. 2170 of 2026 primarily on account of the reason that the matter was under investigation and the charge sheet was not yet submitted. The bail was rejected at that stage. 4. Learned counsel has referred to paragraph 16 of the petition to submit that charge sheet has been submitted on 31.03.2026 and it has been committed to the court of sessions on 20.04.2026 and the next date for charge was on 23.04.2026. However, he submits on instructions that the charge has not been framed so far. 5. Learned counsel submits that after the rejection of the bail order of the petitioner, a few co-accused persons have been also granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petitioner also does not have any criminal antecedent. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. 2026:JHHC:13957 2 7. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injury found is simple in nature and there are general and omnibus allegation against 300 to 400 villagers. 8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted and as the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C. Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 9. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 10. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 08.05.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-