Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11916 (AP)

DESU KRISHNA REDDY v. SIREESHA

CC/991/2019 · 2026-09-28

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010388402019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 991/2019 Between: 1. DESU KRISHNA REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST,R/O 5/71, TIRUPALLE , H/O ANANTARAJU PETA, RAILWAY KODURU, KADAPA DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SIREESHA, Tahasildar, Railway koduru Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa Dist. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon and punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience to the orders of this Honourble Court in I.A. NO.1/2019 in W.P. No. 2121/2019, dated 21.02.2019 and 11.03.2019 under sections 10 to 12 of the contempt of courts Act and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. EADARA PEDDANNA Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. P SUBASH 2 The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the interim order passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.2121 of 2019 on 11.03.2019, wherein this Court passed the following order: “….Having regard to the facts & submissions and the material documents filed along with the writ petition, particularly, the pattadar passbooks & title deed books and the copies of Adangal pahanaies, this Court is satisfied that sufficient cause is shown for granting an interim order till the next date of hearing. Accordingly, there shall be an interim direction, as prayed for, till 11.03.2019..…” 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 11.03.2019 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.2121 of 2019 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 29.09.2026 KGR/CJP 3 25 HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Contempt Case No.991 of 2019 Date : 29.09.2026 KGR/CJP 4