Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11907 (JHR)

SHIV KUMAR SAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2255/2026 · 2026-05-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13581 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2255 of 2026 ------ 1. Shiv Kumar Sah, son of Late Manohar Sah 2. Lali Devi, wife of Shiv Kumar Sah 3. Sikha Kumari @ Shikha Kumari, daughter of Shiv Kumar Sah 4. Mahabir Sah @ Mahabir Kumar Sah, son of Shiv Kumar Sah 5. Mohit Sah @ Mohit Kumar Sah, son of Shiv Kumar Sah 6. Sulekha Devi, wife of Mahabir Sah @ Mahabir Kumar Sah 7. Lakahmi Devi @ Lakhsmi Kumari, wife of Dipankar Sah @ Deepankar Kumar All are residents of Gauripur, P.O. and P.S. Borio, District Sahibganj .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Pratiush Kumar, Advocate Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P. ------ 02/06.05.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Borio P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 303(2), 334(2), 115(2), 117(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the informant is the sister of petitioner no.2. He submits that the allegations are there that house was handed over to informant, however, the same was taken back after five years. He further submits that in the FIR, vital part has been concealed to the effect that the informant has entered into agreement with petitioner no.1 and paid Rupees Four Lakhs to him for construction of her house. He also submits that entire family members have been made accused. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that it appears that the house previously provided was taken back by the petitioner no.1. 5. Considering that the informant is own sister of petitioner no.2 and for the alleged allegation as noted in the argument of learned 2026:JHHC:13581 counsel for the petitioners and entire family members have been made accused, in the attending facts and circumstance, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sahibganj, in connection with Borio P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 08.05.2026