Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11907 (DEL)

ANKIT SHARMA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./3833/2026 · 2026-07-10

Madhu Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3833/2026 ANKIT SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar and Mr. Yashwant Singh, Advs. Petitioner in person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, Learned APP for the State Ms. Rozy, Adv. for R2 R2 in person SI KP Singh PS New Ashok Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 10.07.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.M.A. 15543/2026 2. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3833/2026 3. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’), seeking quashing of FIR No. 333/2024 registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi, under Section 118(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNS’), along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom. 4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 11:43:33 5. The petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present before this Court and have been duly identified by the Investigating Officer concerned, Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi. 6. Briefly stated, the present FIR came to be registered on the complaint of respondent No. 2. During the pendency of the proceedings, with the intervention of family members and well-wishers, the parties amicably resolved all their disputes and executed a Memorandum of Understanding dated 22.11.2025. 7. Learned counsel for the parties submit that petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 are son and father, respectively. In view of their familial relationship, the disputes have been amicably resolved and no monetary consideration is payable by either party under the settlement. 8. On the query made by this Court, respondent no.2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent no.2 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties vide Memorandum of Understanding (‘MoU’) dated 22.11.2025 entered into between them. 9. In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 10. Accordingly, FIR No. 333/2024, registered at Police New Ashok Nagar, for the offences punishable under Section 118 (2) of BNS and all This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 11:43:33 consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, are hereby quashed. 11. The present petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 12. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J JULY 10, 2026/ys/P This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 11:43:33