Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11907 (AP)

Peethala Sesharao v. Sri. G Sai Prasad, I.A.S.

CC/1720/2026 · 2026-09-24

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010203682026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1720/2026 Between: 1. PEETHALA SESHARAO,, S/O. SAMBAYYA, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR R/O. D.NO.11-44, BATTULA VARI SAVARAM, CHELLURU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533 261 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI M N HARENDHIRA PRASAD I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING) KAKINADA DISTRICT KAKINADA. 4. G SRINIVAS RAO, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, DOWLESWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. V V RAMA KRISHNA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DRAINAGE DIVISION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 30965 /2025 dated 17.11.2025 by Learned Single Judge Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3 The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.30965 of 2025 on 17.11.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order: “….This Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amount to the petitioner in accordance with the quality control certificates, dated 09.07.2019 for a sum of Rs.1,04,238/- issued by the respondents, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order..…” 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 17.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.30965 of 2025 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 25.09.2026 KGR/GCD 4 129 HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Contempt Case No.1720 of 2026 Date : 25.09.2026 KGR/GCD 5