Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010880492015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3214/2017 Between:
1. CH. PYDAMMA, W/O LATE SPRAPPADU, HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS;O:CCU: HOUSOLIFE, R/O GUSHINI VILIAGE, NELLIMARLA MANDALAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. CH.LAKSHAMANA, S/ O LATE SURAPPACIU, HINDU, AGED 24 YEARS; R/O GUSHINI VILLAGE NELLIMARLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. CH. CHINRANJEEVI,, S/O. LATE S:USIAPPADU, HINDU, AGED 22 YEARS, -I. R/O GUSHINIVILIAGE, NELLIMARLA MANCLALAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. CH. SEETHAMMA, D/O LATE SURAPPACTU, HINDU, AGED 19 YEARS, OCCU: HOUSEWIFE, R/O GUSHINIVILLAGE, NELLIMARLA MANDALAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. REDDY RAMESH, S/O PYDINAIDU, HINDU, AGE'33 YEARS, OCCU:
DRIVER OF JEEP NO AP,31 Y 1845, R/O G. AGRAHARAM STREET ,CHEEPURAPALLI VILLAGE & MANDALAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. K APPALA RAJU, S/O VENKATESWARA RAJU, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS, OWNER OF JEEP NO: AP 31 Y 1845, R/O D. NO 16-132, MODAMAMBA COLONY, MADUGULA VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. M MAHESH, S/O VENKATA RAMANA, HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS, OWNER OF JEEP NO: AP 31 Y 1845, R/O D. NO 2 -24, MUNAGAPAKA, PARWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2
4. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP., BY ITS MANAGER JAIPUR. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
0/ AT E-8, E.P.I.P, SITAPURA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN STATE - 302022
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High CourtBeing aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 03.07.2017 in O.P. No. 359 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum III Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Ananthapuramu, for the following among other grounds IA NO: 1 OF 2015(MACMAMP 30338 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2017(MACMAMP 5645 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the delay of 65 in representing the MACMA SR.No. 30337 of 2015 and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(MACMAMP 5646 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 323 days in filing the appeal against the award dated 09- 07-2014 in MVOP 878/2011 on the file of MACT-the special judge for trial of Cases under the SCs & STs(POA) Act-cum-Addl. District Judge,Vizianagaram and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2017(MACMAMP 5647 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to declare the 4th petitioner herein 4th appellant in MACMA as major consequently discharge the 4th petitioner from the Guardoan/Next Friend of 1st Petitioner/Appellant filed against the award dated 09-07-2014 in MVOP 879/2011 on the file of MACT-the special judge for trial of cases under the SCs &STs(POA) act-cum Addl. District JUdge,Vizianagaram and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. RAJASEKHAR RAO T(SC FOR JNTU KKDA) Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3
1.
V HEMANTH KUMAR
2. The Court made the following:
4
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
I.A.No.2 of 2017
In/And
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3214 OF 2017
JUDGMENT:
I.A.No.2 of 2017 is filed seeking condonation of delay of 323 days in filing MACMA.No.3214 of 2017. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. On the last adjournment i.e. on 19.09.2026 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the petition. In the result, I.A.No.2 of 2017 is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.3214 of 2017 is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J Dt:28.09.2026 Scs
5
110
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
I.A.No.2 of 2017
In/And
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3214 OF 2017
Dated: 28.09.2026
SCS