[2026:RJ-JP:14441] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12785/2025 Satish Kumar S/o Dharampal, Aged About 46 Years, R/o House No. 212 VTC Daahar, 37 Post Daahar, District Panipat, Hariyana. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16295/2025 Gaurav S/o Rameshchand, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 140/317, Rani Manghi Kashi Complex, Ahilyaganj Bazaar, Post Gayatri Tapobhumi, Up Zila Chata, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Joshi, Adv. for Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. with Mr. Harshit Bhatt, Adv. and Ms. Stuti Dave, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP Mr. Deepak Kumar, C.O. Nangal, Rajawatan, Dausa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/04/2026 1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.276/2011, registered at Police Station Nangal Rajawtan, District Dausa for the offences under Sections 379 and 285 of IPC and Section 3 of PDPP Act, and Section 15 of Explosives [2026:RJ-JP:14441] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12785/2025] Substance Act, the accused-petitioners has preferred this criminal misc. bail applications under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the petitioners have been involved solely on the disclosure statements of the other co-accused and most of them have been acquitted by the trial Court vide judgment dated 25.11.2024. It is also contended that the FIR was lodged in the year 2011 alleging the fact that pilferage was found in the pipeline laid by Ayush. The Police after investigation submitted charge- sheet against the other co-accused namely, Arvind, Sarnaam, Anandgiri, Atresha, Pandey, Vinod Sharma, Sidhraj, Amardeep Singh, Gangasahai and Ramnivas. It is further contended that the investigation was kept pending qua the petitioners for almost 14 years and without assigning any reasons the Police is not justified to arrest the petitioners. The petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, therefore, their anticipatory bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Investigating Officer is present in person before the Court and submits that the petitioners were named in the alleged offence by the other co-accused. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail applications. 5. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the fact that the other co-accused have already been acquitted by the trial Court vide order dated 25.11.2024 and it is also not denied that the petitioners have been named in the alleged offence merely on the disclosure statements of the other [2026:RJ-JP:14441] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12785/2025] co-accused, who have been acquitted, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail applications of the accused- petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Satish Kumar S/o Dharampal and 2. Gaurav S/o Rameshchand, in connection with FIR No.276/2011, registered at Police Station Nangal Rajawtan, District Dausa, they shall be released on bail, provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (iv) that the petitioners would submit their Mobile phones and Sim Cards before the concerned Investigating Officer. (v) that the accused-petitioners would submit their contact details along with the present addresses to the concerned Investigating Officer. In case if the petitioners changes their addresses or mobile numbers, they shall submit the same before the concerned Investigating Officer. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-107-108