HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16125 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 01.04.2026, whereby he has been terminated from service. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Life Insurance Corporation of India has raised preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the instant writ petition on the ground of availability of an efficacious statutory alternative remedy to file an appeal before the higher authority under Rule 7(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation of India Development Officers (Revision of Certain Terms and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2009. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not refuted the contention as raised by learned counsel for the respondents qua availability of an alternative remedy, as mentioned above. 4. As such, instant writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable on the ground of availability of an efficacious statutory alternative remedy, as mentioned above. October 1, 2026 VR Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aviral Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Siddharth Singhal (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Ankur Singh .....Petitioner(s) Life Insurance Corporation Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad