- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9624 WP No. 29994 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 29994 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M GSR HEALTH SCIENCES PROP. MR. G SUDERSHAN REDDY S/O SRI GOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS SRI SAI NIVASAMI No.1796 GROUND FLOOR 21” CROSS 5 MAIN C BLOCK SAHAKAMAGAR BANGALORE 560092 2. MR G SUDERSHAN REDDY S/O SRI GOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS SRI SAI NIVASAMI, No.1796, GROUND FLOOR 21” CROSS 5 MLAIN C BLOCK SAHAKARNAGAR BANGALORE 560092 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANDHYA U. PRABHU., ADV.) Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9624 WP No. 29994 of 2025 AND: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER/MANAGER CANARA BANK REGIONAL OFFICE WEST CHITRAPUR MUTT COMPLEX MALLESWARAML 15THCROSS BANGALORE 560055 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VINAY BHAT., ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL I AT BENGALURU DATED 18/09/2025 IN S.A. NO.304/2025 VACATING THE INTERIM ORDER PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J, B) GRANT SUCH FURTHER AND OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY CONSIDER FIT AND PROPER IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY, AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9624 WP No. 29994 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioners, aggrieved by the order passed in S.A.No.304/2025 vide Annexure-J, wherein the interim order was vacated by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bengaluru. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, S.A.No.304/2025 was dismissed vide order dated 18.09.2025. In view of dismissal of S.A.No.304/2025, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners do not dispute the same as S.A.No.304/2025 was dismissed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. According, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB