Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11892 (KAR)

KRISHNAIAH DEAD BY LRS SMT GOWRAMMA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MSA/58/2024 · 2026-02-19

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10465 MSA No. 58 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 58 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: KRISHNAIAH DEAD BY LRS 1. SMT GOWRAMMA, W/O LATE KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. C K YOGESH, S/O LATE KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3. SMT BHAGYAMMA, D/O LATE KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 4. NAGARAJ, S/O LATE KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, APPELLANTS 1, 2 AND 4 ARE R/AT CHATRANAHALLI VILLAGE, SALAGAME HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK - 573201 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT SHARADAMBA A R, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, H.R.P 2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10465 MSA No. 58 of 2024 1ST FLOOR, HASSAN 573201, …RESPONDENT THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.03.2019 PASSED IN LAC (APPEAL) NO.236/2017 ON THE FILE OF 5THADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.08.2005 PASSED IN LAC NO.157/2003 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN), HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITIONERS FILED UNDER SEC.18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT This case was called in the morning session, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. 2. On 12.02.2026, the Court had noticed that office objections were not removed even after seven adjournments. Hence, the case was ordered to be listed under the caption 'dismissal'. 3. Even when the case is called in the afternoon session, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10465 MSA No. 58 of 2024 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39