HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30484 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No.203 of 2026, under Sections 74, 333, 115(2), 109(1) 351(3) BNS and Section 9/10 POCSO Act, Police Station Khurja Dehat, District Bulandshahr, 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per prosecution story, the applicant and co- accused persons are stated to have assaulted and caused injuries to the informant and his daughter on 5.7.2026 at 10:15 a.m. The injuries of two injured persons cannot be taken into consideration as they have been manufactured. The medical examination of the two injured persons were conducted on 4.7.2026 itself, one day before the date and time of occurrence, which indicates foul play. It is next submitted that even the FIR is vague as the date mentioned at the end is 3.7.2026 while the incident is stated to have taken place on 5.7.2026. Even otherwise, the injuries sustained by the injured persons were not dangerous to life. The criminal history of two cases Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar Tiwari, Mandeep Singh, Sani Kumar, Yashveer Singh Rana Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vivek .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) assigned to the applicant has been explained. It is further submitted that the co-accused Rajendra, has been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30518 of 2026 vide order dated 15.09.2026. The applicant is in jail since 11.07.2026. Therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, the applicant would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the trial. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let applicant - Vivek be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti- social activity. BAIL No. 30484 of 2026 2 7. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 8. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 30, 2026 S.K. BAIL No. 30484 of 2026 3 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad