Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11888 (GAU)

SRI SONTI BAISHYA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/830/2026 · 2026-08-13

Michael Zothankhuma, Shamima Jahan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010170072026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/830/2026 SRI SONTI BAISHYA SON OF SRI BAKARU BAISHYA, VILLAGE SUNDHIYA, PS RANGIA, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : KAUSHIK JAIN, MR. S C KEYAL,MS. J BAISHYA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 14.08.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. K. Jain, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 229 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Page No.# 2/2 2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. 3. Accordingly, the delay of 229 days is condoned. 4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. 5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant