APHC010077782020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 4812/2020 Between: 1. KANTHETI SUBBAYAMMA, W/O LATE NARASIMHA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED 55 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O KARLAPUDI (V), AMARAVATHI (M), GUNTUR DIST. 2. MANCHIKALAPUDI ALIVELU,, W/O LATE CHINA VEERA RAGHAVAIAH, HINDU, AGED 42 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O KARLAPUDI (V), AMARAVATHI (M), GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. KANTHETI SUBBA RAO, S/O LATE NARASIMHA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O KARLAPUDI (V), AMARAVATHI (M), GUNTUR DIST. 4. VADLURI LAKSHMI PRASANNA, W/O RAJU, HINDU, AGED 36 YEARS, DOCTOR WORKING AT PEDDAPALLI, TELANGANA STATE, PERMANENT R/O KARLAPUDI (V), AMARAVATHI (M), GUNTUR DIST. 5. KANTHETI V.S.N.A.P.P KUMAR, S/O LATE NARASIMHA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O KARLAPUDI (V), AMARAVATHI (M), GUNTUR DIST. 6. MANCHIKALAPUDI HIMAJA,, D/O LATE CHINNA VEERA RAGHAVAIAH, HINDU, AGED 19 YEARS, STUDENT, R/O KARLAPUDI (V), AMARAVATHI (M), GUNTUR DIST. 7. MANCHIKALAPUDI RISHI LAKSHMAN, S/O LATE CHINNA VEERA RAGHAVAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS. STUDENT, R/O KARLAPUDI (V), AMARAVATHI (M), GUNTUR DIST, BEING MINOR REP. BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, 3RD 2 PETITIONER ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. A P CAPITAL CITY REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA. 5. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR/LAND POOLING AUTHORITY, UNIT NO.6 ANANTHAVARAM,TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 6. SUB REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS ANANTHAVARAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. NIMMAGADDA VENKATESWARLU, S/O LATE HANUMAIAH, R/O MOTHADAKA VILLAGE, THADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 8. NIMMAGADDA MOHINI LAKSHMI, W/O VERRANJNAYULU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O MOTHADAKA VILLAGE, THADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 9. NIMMAGADDA SUBBARAO, S/O VERRANJNAYULU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O MOTHADAKA VILLAGE, THADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 10. NIMMAGADDA SURESH, S/O VERRANJNAYULU AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O MOTHADAKA VILLAGE, THADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 11. NIMMAGADDA LAVANYA, D/O VERRANJNAYULU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/O MOTHADAKA VILLAGE, THADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 3 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in substituting / mutating the names of the respondents 7 to 11 in the place of late Nimmagadda Veeranjaneyulu in the Revenue records maintained by them under the land pooling scheme under APCRDA Act in respect of Ac 1-26 Cents in Sy.No 230-1A and Ac 4-75 Cents in S.No. 230-2 of Ananthavaram (V), Tullur(M) as arbitrary, illegal, opposed to the principles of natural justice and Articles 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings initiated by the respondents 4 & 5 in respect of Ac 1 - 26 Cents in Sy.No 230-1A and Ac 4 - 75 Cents in S.No: 230-2 of Ananthavaram Village Tullur(M), in favor of the respondents 7 to 11 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass s Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. DODDALA YATHINDRA DEV 3. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.4812 of 2020 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already filed O.S.No.366 of 2019 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, against the un-official respondents herein, for declaration and recovery of possession and as such, requested to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded, accordingly. 3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 29.09.2026 KA / JS 5 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.4812 of 2020 Date: 29.09.2026 KA / JS