Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11880 (BOM)

KIRAN CHANDAN RUNWAL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/1318/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 934 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1318 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 934 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1318 OF 2026 KIRAN CHANDAN RUNWAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Adv. S. S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. G. A. Kulkarni, APP for Respondents-State ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 22/09/2026 Per Court: . The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the prayer for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus has already become infructuous. 2. The learned APP placed on record the copy of the medical report pursuant to the directions of this Court under the order dated 08.09.2026, mentioning that the concerned Doctors were not able to give any opinion as to whether an abortion was took place in respect of the missing girl. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to pursue the concerned Magistrate in respect of prayer clause-D of the petition. 2026:BHC-AUG:44071-DB 2 934 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1318 OF 2026 4. In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of with liberty as aforesaid. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/