NARAYAN SINGH v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYATI RAJYA, UTTAR PRADESH GOVERNMENT AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/16151/2026 · 2026-09-30
Dinesh Pathak
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11879 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11879 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16151 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on Board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:
"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to grant Pension gratuity and other retiral Benefits to the petitioner within the time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 20.5.2026 of the petitioner within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (c) Issue any suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the instant case."
3. Learned counsel appearing for the State-respondent no. 1 has contended that the grievance of the present petitioner regarding retiral benefits, as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Executive Officer (respondent no.3) and that he has no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Narayan Singh, Tarun Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Narayan Singh .....Petitioner(s) Principal Secretary Panchayati Rajya, Uttar Pradesh Government And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Executive Officer (respondent no. 3) to ventilate his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of the same, if there is no other legal impediment. 5. With the aforesaid directions and observations, present writ petition stands disposed of.
October 1, 2026 Neetu WRIA No. 16151 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- NEETU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad