Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13897 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1159 of 2025 ------ Khiru Rai, S/o Late Dilo Rai, R/o Village Rachinahi, Naya Tola, P.O. & P.S. Matihari, District Begusarai, Bihar. … … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Sri Anurag Gupta, the Director General of Police, Jharkhand, having its office at Police Headquarters, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi.
3. Sri Prabhat Kumar, the Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police, having its office at Police Headquarters, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi.
4. Sri S. Kartik, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police, having its office at Police Headquarters, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi.
5. Sri Kishore Kaushal, the Commandant, Jharkhand Armed Police, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & District Hazaribagh. … … Opposite Parties ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar Rai, Advocate
For the O.P. (s) : Mr. Shubham Mishra,
AC to SC (Mines)-II -----
05/ 08.05.2026
Heard the parties.
2.
This Contempt Petition has been preferred by the petitioner against non-compliance of order dated 28.04.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No.6909 of 2024.
3.
It has been submitted by learned counsel representing the opposite party – State, that the amount has been disbursed.
4.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that though the amount has been paid, there may be some discrepancy in the quantum. He submits that liberty may be given to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the appropriate Forum, if any discrepancy arises in quantum.
2026:JHHC:13897
5.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this Contempt Proceeding is dropped.
6.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance before the appropriate Forum, if he is aggrieved by the quantum.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 08th May, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2
Uploaded on 14.05.2026