Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11875 (HP)

DHAMWANTI v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/6993/2026 · 2026-06-16

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6977 of 2026 and connected matters. Decided on: 16.06.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No. 6977 of 2026 Savitri …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors ....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No. 6979 of 2026 Rita Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors ....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No. 6980 of 2026 Anita …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors ....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CWP No. 6993 of 2026 Dhamwanti …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors ....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. CWP No. 6994 of 2026 Anita Kumari …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors ....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. CWP No. 7000 of 2026 Geeta Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors ....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Ranjana, Advocate vice Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents- State in all the matters. Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate for the respondent-State Election Commission, in all the matters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that with the efflux of time and subsequent events, all these writ petitions have been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 16, 2026 Judge R.Atal 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.