Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010156722026 2026:GAU-AS:11909 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2158/2026 SUBHANKAR KAR S/O SANAT KAR, R/O VILL DIPA, NEAR MAJU RAILWAY STATION, PS JAGATBALLAVPUR, DIST HOWRAH, WEST BENGAL, PIN 711408 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : R AMIN, S K RAHMATULLAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 20.08 . 2026 Heard Mr. R. Amin, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for the grant of regular bail to the accused/ petitioner, namely, Subhankar Kar, who was Page No.# 2/2 arrested on 12.07.2026, in connection with Barpeta Road P.S. Case No. 17/2026 registered under Sections 61 (2) (a)/127 (2)/ 310 (2)/ 312/ 329(3) of the BNS, 2023, read with Sections 25 (1) (a) of Arms Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has spent 39 days in custody and further custodial interrogation in regard to the aforesaid case may not be necessary and therefore the petitioner would be entitled to the privilege of bail. 4. The learned Addl. P.P has submitted that the Case Diary has been received and sufficient materials are there to implicate the petitioner in the commission of the offences. 5. The learned Addl. P.P has submitted that further detention of the petitioner is required, since an inter state gang is being traced out and release of the petitioner on bail at this stage may hamper the investigation of the case and also hamper the recovery of the looted items. 6. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties I have also considered the contents of the Case Diary. In my considered opinion, the petitioner would not be entitled to be granted bail at this stage. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. JUDGE Comparing Assistant