[2026:JHHC:15236] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4177 of 2026 Ramu Saw, aged about 30 years, S/O Khublal Saw @ Dipu Saw, R/O Village & P.O.-Dwarpahri, P.S. Jamua, Dist.- Giridih,Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Sr. Adv. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra , Addl. PP 02 / 15.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.03 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 109, 111(3), 351(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the injury report issued on 04.01.2026 i.e. on the date of occurrence, by the concerned doctor of the Community Health Centre, Jamua, Giridih goes to show that the informant has only sustained lacerated wound and a supplementary opinion has also been furnished by the same doctor on 12.01.2026 and as by that time the NCCT of the head, though was advised had not been done, the doctor opined that the injury caused to the informant is simple in nature and caused by hard and blunt object. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the bail application. It is then submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted on bail by this court vide order dated 04.05.2026 passed in B.A. No. 3691 of 2026, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.03 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 15.05.2026 Smita/-