MU EKLAKHA AHAMAD v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/15922/2026 · 2026-09-29
Siddharth Nandan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15922 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Heard Sri Suneel Thekma, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Arvind Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent no.5.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices to respondents nos. 5 and 6 are being dispensed with.
3. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that his father was appointed to the post of Sweeper/Class-IV in Gandhi Smarak Triveni P.G. College, Bardah, District Azamgarh, on 30.10.1991, and he died-in- harness on 08.01.2025.
4. The petitioner has also made an application, along with the supporting application of the petitioner's mother and the other relevant documents, on 15.09.2026 before respondent no. 2; however, learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioner has to approached respondent no. 6, i.e., the Manager of the College in question, and in case he moves such an application, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.
5. In view of the aforesaid, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the aforesaid writ petition pending and by the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage, directing the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no.6 within 7 days from today, along with the certified copy of this order; and in the event such a representation is filed by the petitioner within the said period, it is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Poojan Yadav, Suneel Thekma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arvind Kumar Upadhyay, C.S.C. Mu Eklakha Ahamad .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
expected that the respondent no.6 shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within the next 2 months.
6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed off. September 30, 2026 piyush WRIA No. 15922 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad