Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11864 (PNJ)

SAGAR @ CHHOTU v. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

CRM-M/13897/2026 · 2026-03-18

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-138 IN T 238 SAGAR @ STATE OF CORAM: Present: SURYA PA 1. that the pro case is fixe Nagarik Su 2. requested t case in a tim 3. direction. 4. 13897-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIGAR AR @CHHOTU VERSUS TE OF HARYANA & ANR. AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUR Mr. H.S. Sitta, Advocate and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate Mr. Rupdamanjeet, Advocate a Mr. Varun Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG Har **** YA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): At the very outset it has been prosecution evidence in this case ha fixed for statement of accused und rik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 ( In view of above, the learne ested that direction be given to the lea in a time-bound manner. He wants to withdraw this p Permitted to do so. PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRM-M-13897-2026 (O&M DECIDED ON: 18.03.202 .....PETITIONER RSUS .....RESPONDENTS SURYA PARTAP SINGH e and vocate and ocate and cate G Haryana. s been stated by learned State Couns case has already been concluded and th ed under Section 351 of the Bharatiy (Section 313 CrPC). earned counsel for the petitioner learned trial Court to dispose of th this petition with the abovementione (O&M) 03.2026 S Counsel and the haratiya has e of the ntioned VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.20 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-138 5. within two 6.      13897-2026 (O&M) 2 The learned trial Court is di in two months.           Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No  Whether reportable Yes/No t is directed to dispose of the petitio            es/No es/No petition   VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.20 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-138 13897-2026 (O&M) 3 VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.20 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document