Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11862 (KAR)

ASHOK MADDI v. THE ASST REGISTRAR OF

WP/37340/2025 · 2026-03-24

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16514 WP NO.37340 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.37340 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: ASHOK MADDI S/O LATE G.B. MADDI, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT PLOT NO.6, RS NO.27-E, GURUNATH NAGAR, NEAR AMBANNAVAR LAYOUT, ANAND NAGAR ROAD, HUBBALLI - 580 024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N. MANOHAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASST. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES CIRCLE-III, MALLESWARAM 17TH CROSS, BENGALURU - 560 003. 2. KARNATAKA URBAN HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR, NO.12, SRI. ADICHUNCHUNAGIRI MATTA COMMERCIAL BUILDING, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16514 WP NO.37340 OF 2025 RESPONDENT NO.2-SOCIETY TO REGISTER THE SITE NOS.69 AND 12 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, WHICH ARE ALLOTTED BY THE SOCIETY IN FAVOUR OF THE FATHER AND MOTHER OF THE PETITIONER; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The petitioner herein has sought for direction to the respondent No.2-Society to register the Site Nos.69 and 12 in favour of the petitioner, which are allotted in favour of parents of the petitioner. 2. Heard Sri. N. Manohar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Yogesh D. Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the prayer made in the writ petition, I am of the view that the writ petition is not maintainable as the respondent No.2 is not an instrumentality of the State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India to exercise writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioner to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16514 WP NO.37340 OF 2025 approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievance, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16