ANIMULLAH ABDULLAH CHAUDHARY v. KEDARNATH MAHADEV TIWARI
WP/4976/2025 · 2026-09-23
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11862 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11862 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4976 OF 2025 Animullah Abdullah Chaudhary .... Petitioner Vs. Kedarnath Mahadev Tiwari .... Respondent Ms. Aditi Naikare, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. D.R. Singh a/w Mr. S.H. Singh i/b R.B. Singh & Associates for Respondent.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 23rd September 2026 P.C. :
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsels, after arguing for some time, agree that the Trial Court may decide the maintainability of Obstructionist Application No. 10 of 2017, particularly as to whether the same is maintainable at the instance of Respondent-Defendant No. 2 in the suit. In the event that the Court holds, prima facie, that the said application is maintainable, it may permit the Applicant to amend the pleadings and incorporate therein the schedule as set out at page 39 of the Writ Petition.
3. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed.
[ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] 1/1 31 WP 4976.25.doc Dusane BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2026.09.29 12:21:28 +0530