Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11861 (KAR)

SRI B V MALLESHAPPA v. KPTC EMPLOYEES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD

WP/5000/2026 · 2026-03-03

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12774 WP No. 5000 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.5000 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B.V. MALLESHAPPA S/O LATE VEERAMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.77, PUSHKARA, 2ND MAIN, M.S. RAMAIAH ENCLAVE, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, 8TH MILE, BENGALURU - 560073. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RISHI N UMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KPTC EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. REG. UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959, OFFICE AT DAS BUILDING, NEXT TO BESCOM, INTEGRATED CONTROL CENTRE-2, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560010, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12774 WP No. 5000 of 2026 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, ALI ASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560052. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, SAHAKARA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO FORTHWITH EXECUTE AND REGISTER THE ABSOLUTE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE NO. 74 KADABAGERE LAYOUT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER WITHIN A TIME-BOUND PERIOD TO BE FIXED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12774 WP No. 5000 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India, against the respondent - Society which is not a State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. 2. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18