Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1186 (RAJ)

GAURAV SHARMA SON OF RAMESHCHAND SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7711/2025 · 2026-04-07

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7711/2025 1. Gaurav Sharma Son Of Rameshchand Sharma, Resident Of Dilli Darwaja Bahar, Alwar. 2. Ishant Sain Son Of Hemant Kumar, Resident Of Near Pahadganj Hajuri Gate, Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Rahul Saini Son Of Kailash Chand Saini, Resident Of Atta Mandir Ke Pichhe, Kishan Halwai Shop Alwar, Police Station Kotwali, Alwar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Hemat Gajraj, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 07/04/2026 ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k rFkk ifjoknh&izR;FkhZ dze&2 dh vksj ls fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k us la;qDr :i ls fuosnu fd;k fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; jkthukek gks pqdk gS rFkk ekeyk vHkh vuqla/kkuk/khu gSA ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk jkthukek rLnhd dj izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gS] vr% jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk&dksrokyh] vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 757@2025 rFkk vuqla/kku dh dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;k tkosA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA [2026:RJ-JP:14312] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7711/2025] fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk rF;kRed fjiksVZ izLrqr dh x;h] ftlds lkFk iqfyl ds le{k vfHk;qDrx.k o ihfMr@ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr jkthukes dh vknsf'kdk izLrqr djrs gq, bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) ifjoknh dh djhc lk<s rhu yk[k :i;s dh dkj dks pqjkus dk vkjksi gS] nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; gq, jkthukek dks vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk rLnhd fd;k tk pqdk gS] vijk/k xaHkhj o t?kU; izd`fr dk ugha gSA i{kdkjku~ ds e/; lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k LFkkfir gks pqds gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vc vuqla/kku vFkok vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks tkjh j[kus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds izdk'k esa orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o mlds vk/kkj ij lafLFkr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk ;kphx.k ds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk&dksrokyh vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 757@2025 dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /18