[2026:JHHC:15226] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.568 of 2026 ------ 1. Vaibhav Arora, aged about 34 years, S/o Krishan Kumar, R/o-B- 93, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar 4, P.O.- Amar Colony, P.S.- Amar Colony, District- South Delhi, Delhi-110024 2. Krishan Kumar Arora @ Krishan Kumar, aged about 62 S/o Hukum Chand Arora, R/o-B-93, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar 4, P.O.- Amar Colony, P.S.- Amar Colony, District- South Delhi, Delhi- 110024 3. Abha Arora, aged about 55 W/o Krishan Kumar Arora, R/o-B-93, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar 4, P.O.- Amar Colony, P.S.- Amar Colony, District- South Delhi, Delhi-110024 4. Saurabh Arora, aged abut 31, S/o Krishan Kumar, R/o-B-93, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar 4, P.O.- Amar Colony, P.S.- Amar Colony, District- South Delhi, Delhi-110024 … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Isha Malhotra, aged about 34 W/o Vaibhav Arora, D/o Tapesh Malhotra, R/o Flat No. 403, Ishwar Enclave, PE PE Compound, P.S.- Hindpiri, P.O.- General Post Office (G.P.O. Ranchi), Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001 … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Karan Shah Deo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : None ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-15-05-2026 Heard the parties. Though notice has validly been served upon the opposite party No.2 yet no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party No.2 in spite of repeated calls. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3419 of 2024 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.01.2026 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.3419 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.01.2026 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA), on the condition the ground of which the petitioner was granted time. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the said amount could not be deposited within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3419 of 2024 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 05.01.2026 passed by this Court. It is also submitted that the said amount has already been deposited and the proof of the same has also been filed. It is next submitted that non- compliance of the said peremptory order dated 05.01.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3419 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3419 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.3419 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3419 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-15.05.2026-Animesh/