IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26834 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2026 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Vishnu Kushwaha @ Vishanu Kushwaha @ Vishanu Kumar S/O Ramashray Bhagat Resident of Vill.- Barawa Kaparpura, P.O and P.s- Hathua,Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. X W/o- Y Resident of Village Palni, P.S. Manpur, District- Nalanda, at present R/o- Ratanchak Naya Tola, P.S. Hathua, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Bhim Sen Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No.48 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 109 of the BNS, under Section 27 of the Arms Act and under Sections 8 and 10 of POCSO Act and under Section 64 of the BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has made firing at the house of the informant due to which the window panes were broken. The petitioner has fired to kill the daughter of the informant as the petitioner was having relationship with the daugther of the informant prior to the occurrence and was pressurizing the daughter of the informant for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26834 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 continuing the relation. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear that the name of this petitioner is based only on suspicion. It has further been submitted that only allegation against the petitioner is that of firing and nobody has received any injury. Only the window panes were broken due to firing. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 13.02.2026. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned counsel for the Informant. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Spl. Judge, POCSO, Gopalganj in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No.48 of 2026. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T