( 2026:JHHC:15210 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 343 of 2025 ------ 1. Saryu Dangi, aged about 57 years 2. Arjun Prasad Dangi, aged about 53 years 3. Kedar Prasad Dangi, aged about 51 years, all sons of late Puran Mahto, all resident of village –Unta, P.O.+P.S. – Chatra, District –Chatra. 4. Mostt. Satiya Devi, aged about 85 years, wife of late Jodhan Mahto, resident of village –Peksha, P.O. & P.S. –Gidhaur, District –Chatra 5. Lakhiya Devi, aged about 78 years, wife of late Ramlal Mahto, resident of village –Itkhori, P.O. & P.S. –Itkhori, District –Chatra 6. Lachhiya Devi, aged about 69 years, wife of Janki Mahto, resident of village –Pitiz, P.O. & P.S. –Itkhori, District – Chatra. 7. Samundri Devi, aged about 67 years, wife of Dewani Mahto, resident of village –Dariyatu, P.O. & P.S. –Chatra, District – Chatra. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, P.O. & P.S. –Chatra, District –Chatra 2. Divisional Forest Officer, South Divison, Chatra, P.O. & P.S. –Chatra, District –Chatra. .... .... .... Opp. Parties ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner s : Mr. Sarvendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praveen Akhauri, SC (Mines)-I ------ Order No.04 Dated- 15.05.2026 Heard the parties. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioners for restoration of S.A. No. 163 of 2020 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that S.A. No. 163 of 2020 was dismissed for default of the appellants vide order dated 27.02.2023 passed in the said S.A. No. 163 of 2020. It is next submitted that, the learned counsel for the appellants died before passing of the aforesaid order, as such no one could appear in this case when the same was called out. It is next submitted that the appellants who are the petitioners herein have very good grounds to agitate in the said S.A. No. 163 of 2020 and unless S.A. No. 163 of 2020 is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the S.A. No. 163 of 2020 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, S.A. No. 163 of 2020 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List S.A. No. 163 of 2020 under the appropriate heading after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 15.05.2026 Sonu-