IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 213 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.6.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Pritam Kasna and Anr. ……... Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. ….... Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Animesh Pathak, Advocate, for respondent No.2. _________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Petitioner No.1 Pritam Kasna, who also happens to be husband of petitioner No.2 Paramjeet Kaur, has come present in person. He states that he does not intend to prosecute the case further and as such, be permitted to withdraw the same. 2. Ordered accordingly. June 16, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge