Crl.O.P. NOs. 9693, 9704 & 9715 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P. Nos. 9693, 9704 & 9715 of 2026 & Crl.M.P. Nos. 6893, 6906 & 6912 of 2026 Crl.O.P. No. 9693 of 2026 1. Pranav Global School, Established under Sai Pranav Educational trust, (rep. by its author cum first Trustees 2nd and 3rd petitioners) Rep. by Muthuvignesh (as per affidavit), At No.24, Silapathikaram Street, NH3, Maraimalainagar, Pincode – 603 209. 2. Muthuvignesh 3. Jyothilakshmi ..Petitioners Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sollinganallur, Chennai – 119. 1\6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P. NOs. 9693, 9704 & 9715 of 2026 2. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, ACP II, Team -XI, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sollinganallur, Chennai – 119. 3. K. Mahesh ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records pertaining to Summon dated 30.03.2026 served to 1st petitioner on 3rd respondent’s complaint Ref.C. No. 127/DC-CCB TCP/COP(PG)2026 on the file of the 2nd respondent Police and quash the same. For Petitioner :: Mr.N. Sivakumar For Respondents :: Mr. R. Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 & R2 Crl.O.P. No. 9704 of 2026 Muthuvignesh ..Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sollinganallur, Chennai – 119. 2\6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P. NOs. 9693, 9704 & 9715 of 2026 2. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, ACP II, Team -XI, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sollinganallur, Chennai – 119. 3. K. Mahesh ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records pertaining to Summon dated 30.03.2026 served to 1st petitioner on 3rd respondent’s complaint Ref.C. No. 127/DC-CCB TCP/COP(PG)2026 on the file of the 2nd respondent Police and quash the same. For Petitioner :: Mr.N. Sivakumar For Respondents :: Mr. R. Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 & R2 Crl.O.P. No. 9715 of 2026 1. Sai Pranav Health Care Private Limited, (rep. by 2nd and 3rd petitioners Directors), HIG 573 NH 1, Anna Salai, Maraimalainagar, Chengalpattu, Kanchipuram 603 209. 2. Muthivignesh 3. Jyothilakshmi ..Petitioners 3\6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P. NOs. 9693, 9704 & 9715 of 2026 Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sollinganallur, Chennai – 119. 2. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, ACP II, Team -XI, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sollinganallur, Chennai – 119. 3. K. Mahesh ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records pertaining to Summon dated 30.03.2026 served to 1st petitioner on 3rd respondent’s complaint Ref.C. No. 127/DC-CCB TCP/COP(PG)2026 on the file of the 2nd respondent Police and quash the same. For Petitioner :: Mr.N. Sivakumar For Respondents :: Mr. R. Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 & R2 COMMON ORDER The petitioners are challenging the summons dated 30.03.2026 4\6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P. NOs. 9693, 9704 & 9715 of 2026 issued in connection with C. No. 127/DC-CCB TCP/COP(PG)2026 dated 30.03.2026 calling upon the petitioners to appear on 02.04.2026 for the purpose of enquiry. 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and that they are not involved in any of the offences alleged and only for harassing them, the said summons have been issued. Moreover, the Police have been calling the petitioners over phone and persuading them to settle the dispute with the complainant by paying the amount. 3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the second summons have been issued on 13.04.2026 calling upon the petitioners to appear on 16.04.2026. However, they have not responded to the summons, instead, chose to file these quash petitions. 4. Since a complaint has been lodged as against the petitioners, for the purpose of enquiry,, they have been called. Hence, the petitioners are directed to appear before the 2nd respondent Police, give their explanation along with supporting documents, if any. Instead of doing so, 5\6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P. NOs. 9693, 9704 & 9715 of 2026 M. NIRMAL KUMAR,J. nv challenging the summons is not proper. 5. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the criminal original petitions and they are dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 17.04.2026 nv To 1. The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sollinganallur, Chennai – 119. 2. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, ACP II, Team -XI, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sollinganallur, Chennai – 119. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P. Nos. 9693,9704 & 9715 of 2026 6\6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis