HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9601 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicant and Learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.0503 of 2026, under Sections 115(2) & 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023, P.S. Jagdishpura, District Agra, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the abovementioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is not named in the FIR. The applicant has not been assigned the specific role of firing upon the informant. The applicant has a criminal history of one other case but he is not a previous convict. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and has contended that there is a video of the incident and the applicant's presence on the spot is established from the said video. He, however, does not dispute the fact that there is no material to indicate that it was the applicant who had fired. He has stated that in the statement of witnesses the specific role of firing has been assigned to co-accused Vinay Yadav. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishabh Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Monu @ Mohit Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties. 6. The FIR has been lodged after two days of the occurrence. The applicant has not been named in the FIR. No one is said to have received any injury in the occurrence. The video that is being referred to by Learned A.G.A. does not show the applicant wielding firearm or firing upon the informant, as per the instructions of Learned A.G.A. The criminal history of the applicant has been satisfactorily explained. 7. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge applicant on anticipatory bail. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 9. In the event of the arrest of the applicant-Monu @ Mohit Kumar, he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. NABAIL No. 9601 of 2026 2 11. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 30, 2026 A. Pandey NABAIL No. 9601 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad