Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11836 (JHR)

SACHIDANAND SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/36/2025 · 2026-05-08

Anubha Rawat Choudhary, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14149-DB p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 36 of 2025 ------ Sachidanand Singh, Aged about 65 years Son of Late Ram Nandan Singh, Resident of Village Kharkhol Chaichariya, P.S. Haidernagar, P.O. Haidernagar, District Palamau. ... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Anurag Gupta Son of not known to the petitioner, The Deputy Director General of Police, Special Branch, Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 3. Accountant General (A&E), having its office at Accountant General Office Building, Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi. ... Opp. Parties CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Amit kumar, Advocate : Mr. Manindra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suresh Kumar, S.C. (L&C)-II For the Acct. Gen. : Ms. Richa Sanchita, Advocate : Mr. Vidhan Kumar Singh, Advocate ------ 08/Dated: 8th May, 2026 1. The present contempt case has been filed against the Opposite Party No. 2 for alleged willful and deliberate non-compliance of the order dated 12.12.2023 passed by this Court in L.P.A. No. 566 of 2023. 2. We, after knowing the fact that the final decision was to be taken by the Accountant General on the issuance of authority slip, had impleaded the aforesaid as party to the proceeding. 3. The Accountant General has filed show cause stating inter alia therein at Para-7 that the Pension Intimation Memo has already 2026:JHHC:14149-DB p. 2 been issued and also been communicated to the District Treasury Officer, Palamau vide Application No. 1026217850 dated 16.04.2026. 4. This Court, considering the aforesaid fact, is of the view that now the actual pension in terms of money is to be disbursed by the District Treasury Officer, Palamau and there is no averment as to whether the pension has been released in favour of the petitioner or not. 5. Therefore, this Court is of the view that now the accountability to disburse the pension is of District Treasury Officer, Palamau, and if the order has not been complied, let the same be complied. 6. The Deputy Commissioner Palamau is to ensure the compliance based upon the Pension Intimation Memo. 7. Accordingly, the instant contempt case being Cont. Case (Civil) No. 36 of 2025 stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 8th May, 2026 Samarth