Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11833 (BOM)

ATISH VINAYAK BHOSALE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1501/2025 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

MANOJ 2-BA-1501-2025.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1501 OF 2025 Atish Vinayak Bhosale …Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Vinod Kashid, for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Nitin Belge, PSI, Shil Daighar Police Station, present. CORAM: SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :- 1. Mr. Dedhia, the learned APP states that the case before the trial Court is fixed on 30.09.2026. Six witnesses are already examined. On instructions from Mr. Belge, PSI, he states that the prosecution is going to examine additional 10 witnesses within nine months from 30.09.2026 and conclude the trial. 2. In the backdrop, Mr. Kashid, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Application, with liberty to renew the prayer for bail before the trial Court, if the trial is not concluded in the nine months, as aforestated. 3. Leave and liberty to withdraw is granted. 4. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. 5. It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits. 6. The trial Court to decide the said case and Bail Application of the Applicant, if filed, on its own merits. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Digitally signed by WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Date: 2026.09.29 10:01:02 +0530