Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11832 (JHR)

Puja Devi v. The State Of Jharkhand And Anr

Cr.Rev./1043/2017 · 2026-05-07

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13702 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1043 of 2017 --------- Puja Devi, W/o- Mukund Munda, D/o-Ramu Lohra, R/o-Village-Sanga, P.S.-Pithoria, Dist. Ranchi at present R/o-Village-Ushamatu, Tikratoli, P.O., P.S.-Ratu, Dist.-Ranchi … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mukund Kumar Munda, S/o-Etwa Munda, R/o-Village-Sanga, P.O., P.S.- Pithoria, Dist. Ranchi …. Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwawri, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Amitesh Kumar Geasen, Advocate ----------- 10/Dated: 07th May, 2026 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 are present. 2. It appears that on the last three consecutive dates i.e. 23.11.2023, 06.12.2023 and 28.04.2026, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, on 28.04.2026, the matter was again adjourned for listing on 07.05.2026 with a direction to the office to communicate the order to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner to take proper steps in this case, which is also substantiated by the office note dated 05.05.2026 that a web copy of order dated 28.04.2026 was handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner, but today itself, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and this revision has yet not been admitted. Therefore, it seems that the petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing this case. 3. Accordingly, this criminal revision stands dismissed for default. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Pappu/- 07/05/2026