1 2026:CGHC:7233-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 430 of 2026 1. Naina Chawla D/o Hemant Kumar Chawla Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 138 Bangali Basti Ward No. 14, Manendragarh District Korea C.G. 2. Kanta Chawla W/o Govind Dens Chawla Aged About 55 Years R/o House No. 132 Bangali Basti Ward No. 14, Manendragarh District Korea C.G. 3. Khushboo Anwani W/o Manoj Chawla Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 19, 3rd Floor Rajiv Lochan Housing Board Society Phase 1 Kachna Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G. ... Applicant(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station P.S. Civil Line, District Raipur C.G. 2. Dr. B Balakrishna S/o Late B. Appa Rao R/o C-805, Ashok Royal Ashok Ratna, Shankar Nagar, Tehsil And Dist.- Raipur C.G. ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.02.10 16:51:38 +0530 2 For Applicants : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 10.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the First Information Report related to the applicants bearing Crime No. 363 of 2025 registered against the applicants for offence under Section 120-B, 34 and 409 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh in the interest of justice” 3. Upon perusal of the prayer clause in the present petition, it appears that the petition has been drafted with a defective prayer. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition in its present form, as the prayer is vague and sketchy and does not disclose the date 3 on which the impugned FIR has been registered against the applicants. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition containing an appropriate and complete prayer. 4. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the said request. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, subject to the applicants depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- as costs before the Registry of this Court. The receipt of such deposit shall be submitted at the time of filing the fresh petition, if any. The amount so deposited shall be transmitted to the Government Disabled College, Mana Camp, Raipur (C.G.). 6. Certified copies of the documents annexed to the petition, if any, may be returned to learned counsel for the applicants after retaining photocopies thereof on record. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan