HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15893 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to grant the grade pay of Rs.2000/- with effect from the government order dated 18.3.2011 to the petitioners forthwith or within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble court. ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to make the payment of arrears of salary to the petitioners from the date of enforcement of Government Order dated 18.3.2011 till today forthwith or within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble court. iii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent to consider and decides the representations of the petitioners regarding grant of grade pay of Rs.2000/- in accordance with the Government Order dated 18.3.2011 forthwith or within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble court. iv). Issue a writ, order of direction in nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to grant the same relief to the petitioners also as granted to other junior assistants vide order dated 23.9.2025." 3. Sri Hridaya Narayan Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 has contended that the grievance of the present petitioner raised in the instant writ petition can be more appropriately redressed by the Managing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr. Ashish Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Hridaya Narayan Mishra Yaduveer Singh And 36 Others .....Petitioner(s) Managing Director, U.P. Cooperative Federation Limited (P.C.F.) .....Respondent(s) Director (sole respondent), and he has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Managing Director (sole respondent), to ventilate his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of such representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. September 30, 2026 vinay WRIA No. 15893 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad